Health Care Reform
feed-image Feed Entries

All news related to health care reform.



For Those Who *DID* Impute Income for Overage Dependents in 2010/11
Wednesday, 27 April 2011 11:30

Dear Friend,


As promised, we are conveying the just-now-released-official guidance from the California Economic Development Department regarding overage dependent taxation in this state.  This only applies to those of you who issued W-2s that accounted for the cost of coverage for an overage dependent in California (those of you who did *NOT* do so, feel free to ignore this article in its entirety).

 http://www.edd.ca.gov/Payroll_Taxes/New_state_law_to_conform_income_taxes_with_Federal_Health_Care_Act.htm

For 2010, employers who calculated a fair market value benefit amount as imputed income for California Personal Income Tax (PIT) wages for their employees and subsequently withheld PIT on this value should issue Form W-2C to impacted employees that reflect the correct PIT wage amount. Employers can amend their California state payroll tax returns using our Tax and Wage Adjustment Form (DE 678).

For 2011, if employers calculated a fair market value of the health insurance premium and withheld the applicable PIT in the first quarter and have already filed their Quarterly Contribution Return and Report of Wages (DE 9), they can amend the return by using our Quarterly Contribution and Wage Adjustment Form (DE 9ADJ).

For employers who have calculated PIT wages and withheld PIT from their employees for the first quarter but not yet filed the DE 9 and Quarterly Contribution and Wage Adjustment Form (Continuation) (DE 9C), you may choose to file and report the correct wages and withholding amounts while revising your payroll process internally for the over-reporting and withholding.

Please refer to the 2011 California Employer`s Guide (DE 44), for information on how to amend payroll tax returns. You can access the above forms on our web site on EDD`s Forms and Publications.


Further California taxation-amendment information (this information pertaining to employees) can be found at:

http://www.ftb.ca.gov/professionals/taxnews/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act.shtml

How to File:

Form 540 - On an original tax return

If the employer issued Form W-2 including the amount of medical coverage for your nondependent adult children in your California wages, contact your employer to have them issue you Form W-2C excluding the amount from your California wages. Use form FTB 3525 as a substitute for federal Form W-2C if your employer does not issue you a Form W-2C.

Self-employed individuals may deduct the health insurance premium paid for nondependent adult children under age 27. No California adjustment is needed.

Form 540X “ On a previously-filed tax return

If you have already filed Form 540 with Form W-2 that included the amount of medical coverage for your nondependent adult children in your California wages, contact your employer to have them issue you Form W-2C excluding the amount from your California wages. Use form FTB 3525 as a substitute for federal Form W-2C if your employer does not issue you a Form W-2C. File Form 540X to report the reduction in your California wages.

For self-employed individuals who reported a California adjustment excluding the health insurance premium paid for nondependent adult children, file Form 540X to report the allowed deduction for California.

 

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael J. Cramer, J.D.
Compliance Officer, Beneflex Insurance Services, Inc.  

 
The Mandatory $601.00+ IRS Form 1099 Reporting Provision in PPACA has Been REPEALED
Monday, 18 April 2011 09:19

April 18, 2011

Excellent news: late last-week, President Obama signed into law the REPEAL of the requirement under PPACA that, effective January 1, 2012, employers would have to report to the IRS any purchase of goods or services pertaining to a single transaction for any amount greater than $600.00.  Therefore, your organization need not concern itself whatsoever with the (prospective) changes in the IRS Form 1099 regulations œenacted by this provision going forward

Further reading regarding this matter can be found in the following article:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/14/us-usa-taxes-healthcare-idUSTRE73462D20110414


As always, please feel free to contact our office with any questions!


Best Regards,

Michael J. Cramer, J.D.
Compliance Officer, Beneflex Insurance Services, Inc.

 
Governor Jerry Brown Signs AB 36 - "Repeals" California Tax on Overage Dependents
Tuesday, 12 April 2011 13:38


Dear Friend,

Last Thursday (April 7, 2011), Governor Brown officially signed AB 36.  While neither the California Franchise Tax Board nor the Economic Development Department have issued guidance pertaining to this matter, one aspect that has immediate practical implications is the fact that any individual (who was taxed on overage dependent coverage) who has NOT yet filed his/her California 2010 tax return will not have to account for this on his/her 540 form.  Due to the timing of this matter (i.e., April 18 being less than two weeks away), you may wish to inform your employees of this development at your earliest possible convenience.

Also, those of you who have not amended your payroll/accounting structure in order to comply with the previously-valid law need no longer be concerned with changing your systems.  For those of you who have changed your systems, be advised that we will update you immediately once either (or both) the FTB or the EDD have issued official guidance pertaining to this matter.

Best Regards,

Michael J. Cramer, J.D.
Compliance Officer, Beneflex Insurance Services, Inc.

 
Health Care Reform - Administrative Updates on April 11, 2011
Monday, 11 April 2011 11:55

Dear Friend,

The following three recent health care reform-related administrative issues may be of interest
to your organization:

Cost of Health Coverage Reporting on Employees` W-2 Forms FURTHER DELAYED (for certain organizations)

According to IRS Notice 2011-28, available for viewing at: http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=237894,00.html

For certain employers and with respect to certain types of coverage listed below, the requirement to report the value of coverage will not apply for the 2012 Forms W-2 (the forms required for the calendar year 2012 that employers generally are required to provide employees in January 2013) and will not apply for future calendar years until the IRS publishes guidance giving at least six months of advance notice of any change to the transition relief.

 The transition relief applies to the following:

(1) employers filing fewer than 250 Forms W-2 for the previous calendar year (for example, employers filing fewer than 250 2011 Forms W-2 (meaning Form W-2s for the calendar year 2011, which generally are filed with the SSA in early 2012) will not be required to report the cost of coverage on the 2012 Forms W-2 (which generally are filed with the SSA in early 2013); [emphasis mine]

 

Assembly Bill 36 Enrolled and Presented to Governor Jerry Brown for his Signature on March 30, 2011:

On Wednesday, March 30, 2011, AB 36which will amend California`s Franchise Tax Board regulations to conform with IRC 105/106, therefore allowing coverage to œoverage dependents to be granted free of CA-state tax consequences to the employee”passed its final state-legislative hurdle in the state senate.  Speculation exists that Governor Brown may sign AB 36 within the next few weeks; we will apprise you when/if this occurs.

If in fact Governor Brown does sign this bill, those of you who have taken the (legally correct) step of previously amending your payroll systems to comply with the (presently-existing) overage dependent tax consequences will need to take further action to comply with the NEW law. 

We will apprise you immediately with a general notice if/when the Franchise Tax Board/Economic Development Department issues their amended guidelines.

 

Update on the PPACA-Amended Form 1099 Requirement (Potential Repeal):

As you are no doubt aware by now, one provision contained within PPACA was the requirement that, beginning in 2012, employers must account for any transaction (including purchases of goods) for more than $600 with a 1099 Form.  Due to this provision`s wild unpopularity, concerted efforts are currently underway in US Congress to repeal it; it is quite possible that the bill currently (likely) to pass in the US Senate will be presented to President Obama for his signature within the next two weeks. 

As with AB 36, we will apprise you immediately if/when this 1099 provision is repealed.



If you feel that any of the above warrants further clarification, free to contact our office with questions pertaining to these (or any other benefits-related) matters!


Best Regards,

Michael J. Cramer, JD
Compliance Officer, Beneflex Insurance Services, Inc.
805.684.5100  x108
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 
Health reforms face legal battle - employers should delay any dramatic changes until law's future decided
Tuesday, 01 March 2011 12:36
Regardless of the law`s ultimate fate, experts say strategic planning on issues, such as steps to try to moderate health care cost increases, should continue.
Read more...
 
NAHU Supports Amendment to Defund Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Requirements
Monday, 28 February 2011 12:15
NAHU CEO Trautwein emphasizes support of Price amendment to prevent implementation and enforcement of medical loss ratio (MLR) requirements in PPACA
Read more...
 
UBA document triggers reactions at NAHU Capitol Conference
Monday, 28 February 2011 11:03
"I had no idea", "What a mess!" Congressional offices react to this United Benefit Advisors document highlighting employer concerns and confusion
Read more...
 
«StartPrev12NextEnd»

Page 1 of 2